Effort contagion, the phenomenon in which individuals' effort levels are influenced by the effort levels of others, has been recognized as a crucial factor in team performance. However, the contingencies that shape the contagious nature of effort in new venture management teams remain understudied. This study aims to fill this research gap by examining the moderating role of task interdependence, team cohesion, and leadership style in the relationship between effort contagion and team performance in new venture management teams. Drawing on social motivation theory, we propose that these contingencies can significantly impact the dynamics of effort contagion within the team. The study employs a quantitative research approach, gathering data from new venture management teams through self-report questionnaires and objective performance measures. The findings of this study provide valuable insights into the factors that influence the contagious power of effort in new venture management teams and offer practical implications for enhancing team performance.

Effort contagion, new venture management teams, task interdependence

Aguinis, H., Beaty, J. C., Boik, R. J. and Pierce, C. A. (2005). ‘Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: A 30-year review’. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 94–107.

Ahmadi, S., Khanagha, S., Berchicci, L. and Jansen, J. J. P. (2017). ‘Are managers motivated to explore in the face of a new technological change? The role of regulatory focus, fit, and complexity of decision-mak-ing’. Journal of Management Studies, 54, 209–37.

Amason, A. C., Shrader, R. C. and Tompson, G. H. (2006). ‘Newness and novelty: Relating top manage-ment team composition to new venture performance’. Journal of Business Venturing, 21, 125–48.

Audia, P. G. and Greve, H. R. (2006). ‘Less likely to fail: Low performance, firm size, and factory expansion in the shipbuilding industry’. Management Science, 52, 83–94.

Backes-Gellner, U., Werner, A. and Mohnen, A. (2015). ‘Effort provision in entrepreneurial teams: effects of team size, free-riding and peer pressure’. Journal of Business Economics, 85, 205–30.

Barsade, S. G. (2002). ‘The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 644–75.

Barua, A., Lee, C. H. S. and Whinston, A. B. (1995). ‘Incentives and computing systems for team-based organizations’. Organization Science, 6, 487–504.

Baum, J. R. and Wally, S. (2003). ‘Strategic decision speed and firm performance’. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 1107–29.

Baumeister, R. F. and Leary, M. R. (1995). ‘The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation’. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.

Bitler, M. P., Moskowitz, T. J. and Vissing-Jørgensen, A. (2005). ‘Testing agency theory with entrepreneur effort and wealth’. Journal of Finance, 60, 539–76.

Blatt, R. (2009). ‘Tough love: How communal schemas and contracting practices build relational capital in entrepreneurial teams’. Academy of Management Review, 34, 533–51.

Bøllingtoft, A. and Ulhøi, J. P. (2005). ‘The networked business incubator – leveraging entrepreneurial agency?’. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 265–90.

13. Bradley, S. W., Shepherd, D. A. and Wiklund, J. (2011). ‘The importance of slack for new organizations facing “tough” environments’. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 1071–97.