Today, artificial intelligence tools have opened the door to fantastic opportunities for scientists conducting scientific research. In particular, artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT make it very convenient to write scientific articles. Using ChatGPT, you can quickly and easily write a scientific article, develop an article plan, add facts and evidence, and improve the style of the article. However, using ChatGPT also has its restrictions and rules because artificial intelligence cannot reflect the full human potential. In this thesis, several issues, such as why researchers should use ChatGPT, how to write an influential scientific article using ChatGPT, and the limitations of this artificial intelligence tool, are analyzed.

Artificial Intelligence, scientific article, analysis

Adetayo A. (2023). Artificial intelligence chatbots in academic libraries: the rise of ChatGPT. Library Hi Tech News, 3(40), pp. 18-21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-01-2023-0007

Aljanabi M. (2023). ChatGPT: Future directions, and open possibilities. Mesopotamian journal of Cybersecurity, pp. 16-17.

Bhattacharjee A., and Liu H. (2024). Fighting fire with fire: can ChatGPT detect AI-generated text? ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 25(2), P. 14-21.

Bouschery, S., Blazevic, V., and Piller, F. (2023). Augmenting human innovation teams with artificial intelligence: Exploring transformer-based language models. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 40(2), pp. 139-153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12656

Chan-Olmsted S. M. (2019). A review of artificial intelligence adoptions in the media industry. International Journal on Media Management, 21(3-4), PP. 193–215. doi:https://doi.org/ 10.1080/14241277.2019.1695619

Copeland B. ( 2024, September 26). Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved from Encyclopedia Britannica: https://www.britannica.com/technology/artificial-intelligence

Copeland Jack. (2004). The Essential Turing: Seminal Writings in Computing, Logic, Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence, and Artificial Life: Plus the Secrets of Enigma. New York: Oxford University Press.

Diakopoulos N. (2019). Automating the news: How algorithms are rewriting the media. Cambridge: MA: Harvard University Press.

Dönmez, I. Idil, S., and Gulen, S. (2023). Conducting academic research with the AI interface ChatGPT: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of STEAM Education, 2(6), pp. 101-118. doi:https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/3003468

Heaven W. (2020). OpenAI’s new language generator GPT-3 is shockingly good – and completely mindless. MIT Technology Review, 29(1-6).

Hessman T. (2017). AI, automation, and being human. New Equipment Digest, 82(10), P. 39. Retrieved from https://www.newequipment.com/industry-trends/article/22059532/on-ai-automation-and-being-human

Hutson M. (2022). Could AI help you to write your next paper? Nature, 611(7934), pp. 192-193. doi:pp. 192-193

Kurian, N., Cherian, J. M., Sudharson, N. A., Varghese, K. G., and Wadhwa, S. (2023). AI is now everywhere. British Dental Journal, 72(234-2). doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-023-5461-1

Latar, N. (2015). The Robot Journalist in the Age of Social Physics: The End of Human Journalism? (E. G., Ed.) The New World of Transitioned Media. The Economics of Information, Communication, and Entertainment, pp. 65-80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09009-2_6

Latar, N. (n.d.). The Robot Journalist in the Age of Social Physics: The End of Human Journalism? In: Einav, G. (eds) The New World of Transitioned Media.

Lim W. M, Gunasekara, A.,Pallant, J. L. Pallant J. I., and Pechenkina E. (2023). Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. International Journal of Management Education, 2, pp. 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790

Linden C. (2017). Decades of automation in the newsroom: Why are there still so many jobs in journalism? Digital Journalism, 5(2), pp. 123–140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811. 2016.1160791

Luitse D., and Denkena W. (2021). The great Transformer: Examining the role of large language models in the political economy of AI. Big Data and Society, 8(2), pp. 1-14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951721104773

Mohamed Hammad. (2023). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Programs on Writing Scientific Research. Ann Biomed Eng., 51(3), pp. 459-460. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03140-1

Oçak Z. (2023). Meteksan Matbaacılık ve Teknik Sanayi. Dijital Evrenin Yeni İletişim Kodları IV. Ankara: Tic. Anonim Şirketi.

Roose K. (2022). The brilliance and weirdness of ChatGPT. The New York Times(№ 5).

Rudolph J., Tan S., and Tan Sh. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Ed-tech Reviews, 1(6). doi:https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9

Sundar S. (2020). Rise of machine agency: A framework for studying the psychology of Human–AI Interaction (HAII). Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), pp. 74–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz026

Umarkulov A. (2024, August 20). https://yuz.uz. Advice from a book written by ChatGPT poisoned a family. Usbekistan. Retrieved from https://yuz.uz/news/chatgpt-tomonidan-yozilgan-kitobdagi-maslahat-tufayli-bir-oila-qoziqorinlardan-zaharlandi

www.openai.com. (2024, August 8). ChatGPT — Release Notes. Retrieved from https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6825453-chatgpt-release-notes