Articles | Open Access | Vol. 3 No. 08 (2023): Volume 03 Issue 08 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/social-fsshj-03-08-07

COMPARISON OF THE DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF MRI AND ULTRASOUND IN THE STUDIED PATIENTS AND DETERMINATION OF PROGNOSTIC FACTORS OF ENDOMETRIAL CANCER

Djurakhon Gafurovna Saidkhodjaeva , Associate Professor, Department Of Faculty Hospital Surgery, Andijan State Medical Institute, Andijan, Uzbekistan

Abstract

Endometrial cancer (EM) is the most common malignant tumor in women, most often of reproductive age. EC are detected, according to various sources, in 25 - 50% of women under the age of 50 years. We analyzed the results of examination and treatment of 98 patients. The criterion for inclusion in this study was a morphologically verified squamous EC of stages IB2, IIB and IIIB, the results showed that it is advisable to subject endometrial cancer patients with identified metastases to a special one (chemo, chemoradiotherapy followed by radical operations), as this leads to improved results (in in our study by more than 20%) and an increase in the life expectancy of these patients, also, depending on the stage, depth of tumor invasion and those treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and subsequent radical operations: for example, the five-year relapse-free and overall survival rates were 79.6% and 87 .5%, respectively, in patients with EC stages IB2 - IIIB, which is approximately 20% higher than similar indicators among patients who underwent only combined radiation therapy.

Keywords

Malignant neoplasms, endometrial cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy

References

Alcazar, J.L. Three-Dimensional Power Doppler Ultrasound for Predicting Response and Local Recurrence After Concomitant Chemoradiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Carcinoma of the Cervix / J.L. Alcazar, S. Arribas, R. MartinezMonge et al. // Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. ‒ 2016. ‒ Vol. 26, N 3. ‒ P. 534-538.

Amin, M.B. The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more "personalized" approach to cancer staging / M.B. Amin, F.L. Greene, S.B. Edge et al. // CA Cancer J. Clin. ‒ 2017. ‒ Vol. 67, N 2. ‒ P. 93-99.

Guyot, M. Targeting the pro-angiogenic forms of VEGF or inhibiting their expression as anti-cancer strategies / M. Guyot, C. Hilmi, D. Ambrosetti // Oncotarget. ‒ 2017. ‒ Vol. 8, N 6. ‒ P. 9174-9188.

Colombo, N. Cervical cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up / N. Colombo, S. Carinelli, A. Colombo et al. // Ann. Oncol. ‒ 2012. ‒ Vol. 23 Suppl. 7. ‒ P. vii27-32.

D'Agostino, G. Neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix with epirubicin, paclitaxel and cisplatin / G. D'Agostino, M. Distefano, S. Greggi et al. // Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. ‒ 2002. ‒ Vol. 49, N 3. ‒ P. 256-260.

Hu, K. Comparison of treatment outcomes between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of cervix after definitive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy / K. Hu, W. Wang, X. Liu et al. // Radiat. Oncol. ‒ 2018. ‒ Vol. 13, N 1. ‒ P. 249.

Huguet, F. Preoperative concurrent radiation therapy and chemotherapy for bulky stage IB2, IIA, and IIB carcinoma of the uterine cervix with proximal parametrial invasion / F. Huguet, O.M. Cojocariu, P. Levy et al. // Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. ‒ 2008. ‒ Vol. 72, N 5. ‒ P. 1508-1515.

Jennings, T.S. Results of selective use of operative laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology / T.S. Jennings, P. Dottino, J. Rahaman et al. // Gynecol. Oncol. ‒ 1998. ‒ Vol. 70, N 3. ‒ P. 323-328.

Koh, W.J. Cervical Cancer, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology / W.J. Koh, N.R. Abu-Rustum, S. Bean et al. // J. Natl. Compr. Canc. Netw. ‒ 2019. ‒ Vol. 17, N 1. ‒ P. 64-84.

Kubik, S. Assessment of the relationship between serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) concentration in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix and the risk of relapse / S. Kubik, M. MoszynskaZielinska, J. Fijuth et al. // Prz. Menopauzalny. ‒ 2019. ‒ Vol. 18, № 1. ‒ P. 23-26.

Marlow, L.A.V. Understanding the heterogeneity of cervical cancer screening non-participants: Data from a national sample of British women / L.A.V. Marlow, A.J. Chorley, J. Haddrell et al. // Eur. J. Cancer. ‒ 2017. ‒ Vol. 80. ‒ P. 30-38.

Moloney, F. Comparison of MRI and high-resolution transvaginal sonography for the local staging of cervical cancer / F. Moloney, D. Ryan, M. Twomey et al. // J. Clin. Ultrasound. ‒ 2016. ‒ Vol. 44, N 2. ‒ P. 78-84.

Marita, A. Long-term survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concomitant radiochemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: results of the Oncology Institute "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta" experience / A. Marita, C. Ordeanu, A. Rancea et al. // J. Med. Life. ‒ 2018. ‒ Vol. 11, N 1. ‒ P. 42-50.

Scappaticci, F.A. Mechanisms and future directions for angiogenesis-based cancer therapies / F.A. Scappaticci // J. Clin. Oncol. ‒ 2002. ‒ Vol. 20, N 18. ‒ P. 3906- 3927.

197. Shoji, T. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy using platinum- and taxane-based regimens for bulky stage Ib2 to IIb non-squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix / T. Shoji, E. Takatori, T. Saito et al. // Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. ‒ 2013. ‒ Vol. 71, N 3. ‒ P. 657-662.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Djurakhon Gafurovna Saidkhodjaeva. (2023). COMPARISON OF THE DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF MRI AND ULTRASOUND IN THE STUDIED PATIENTS AND DETERMINATION OF PROGNOSTIC FACTORS OF ENDOMETRIAL CANCER. Frontline Social Sciences and History Journal, 3(08), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.37547/social-fsshj-03-08-07